| |
Gravity is the primary nemesis of accuracy in watch
escapements. Other factors such as inertia and centrifugal forces
also play a role in the accuracy but these
are relatively constant and can be compensated for via adjustments to obtain consistent
timekeeping. Gravity, however, has a strong effect on the balance wheel
(A), hairspring (B), and pallet fork (C) especially given the ever
changing orientation of the watch as it is worn. In other words if
the watch was used in a static position all the time, such as a clock, there would
be little use for the tourbillon. So,
short of sitting the watch in a stationary mode the only way to
overcome the effects of gravity on the escapement is to put the
escapement through as many gravitational changes as possible, over
and over again, as to obtain an average. The traditional tourbillon
accomplished this by rotating the escapement 360 degrees in a single
plane, not a bad solution.
However GREUBEL FORSEY realized that
introducing the escapement to yet another plane of rotation could
be a significant improvement for the wristwatch, and they were correct.
Now maybe you are asking yourself why they didn’t incline
the second axis of rotation at 90 degrees, after all that would
introduce an even greater number of gravitational possibilities.
But inclining the second axis
to 90 degrees would significantly increase the thickness of the
watch to objectionable proportions, while the 30 degree inclination
actually reduces the height of the combined tourbillon cages and
also ensures that the balance wheel does not find itself in an unfavourable
position. |
|